HashSight
Log in
~/reviews› OneMiners
Companies123

Summary

OneMiners

Poor (2.2/5)View full profile →
summary.md
response.log
1The most serious item in this record is not a review but a written confirmation from a named third party: Block Inc.
2confirmed in writing that OneMiners fabricated an entire bulk hardware order story involving them, holds no reseller authorisation, and internally flagged the situation as a scam, with a customer filing FTC, FBI IC3 and Texas Attorney General complaints over it between November 2025 and January 2026.
3Two detailed Bitcointalk investigations substantiate a wider pattern, and forum regulars separately allege coordinated shill accounts and SEO spam.
4Both the Reddit and Bitcointalk passes grade this F.
5These are allegations rather than adjudicated findings, and none of it is a court outcome.
6The day-to-day service reviews genuinely are good and keep arriving — Trustpilot now sits at 4.5 across 110 reviews, up from 4.3 across 100 — and the newest of them are worth distinguishing from the thin five-star entries that make up much of the history, because several are not thin.
7Reviewers through late August describe a seventh miner installed by the company, an S23 Hyd hashing within days, the fee structure set out mechanically (a markup on the electricity price plus an installation fee, with mined bitcoin partly converted to cover power), an instalment-plan grace period found in practice after a missed due date, and a new customer walked through installation who found the dashboard genuinely usable.
8A verified review posted on 1 September 2026 states plainly that rewards and withdrawals are working — a direct, if single and unverifiable, answer on the exact point the serious allegations dispute — and a further entry on 2 September adds only that the process was simple and the response quick.
9Detailed, mechanism-level accounts from repeat customers are stronger evidence than a run of one-line endorsements, and the record now contains both.
10The only recent criticism is mild: that displayed miner profit does not account for energy costs.
11That improvement does not touch the core finding.
12The company pays for a Trustpilot subscription and actively solicits reviews, which makes sheer volume of praise the weakest evidence on this page.
13A technically detailed German one-star alleges the monitoring dashboard displays emulated temperatures, fan speeds and hashrates that do not match real machines, recorded over several days against real miners elsewhere — that sits in the same category as the Block finding, which is misrepresentation of what is actually happening.
14A second, independent account describes a dashboard showing rigs installed and accruing profits in Nigeria from mid-January 2026 that were not in fact running, with a named sales representative attributing it to a dashboard error, offering replacement miners for additional fees, and refunds refused.
15Archived copies of the profile show at least 28 reviews removed between August 2025 and January 2026, exactly the window the serious allegations accumulated, so the visible review set understates the negative history by construction.
16Two further entries need reading with care rather than at face value: a positive that opens by saying the reviewer's earlier review had been removed and is being re-posted, and one-stars that resolve into naming a rival platform, which is the planted-referral pattern seen repeatedly across this directory and should be discounted as testimony.
17Identity note: OneMiners and CircleHash are the same operator — CircleHash LLC trading as OneMiners, confirmed by the company's own statement, a Google Play package identifier of com.circlehash.oneminers, and a Wyoming Secretary of State record — and both are listed separately on this directory, so comparing the two is comparing one company to itself.
18CircleHash's own Trustpilot profile sits at 2.3.
19Recommend caution however good the service reviews look: the fabrication finding speaks to what this company is willing to represent as true, and nothing in the recent positives addresses it.
20A satisfied customer whose withdrawals work is evidence that withdrawals work for that customer; it is not evidence about what was represented to the ones whose did not.
response.log — Company ResponseCompany website ↗
21// No response from the company yet.
Public Thoughts0 comments
>No comments yet — be the first.
Sign in to comment on OneMiners.Log in / Sign up