~/reviewsGoMining
Companies123

Summary

GoMining

summary.md
response.log
1This is not hosting or mining in the sense the name implies: you buy a token representing hashrate, and the economics of that token, not a machine in a shed, decide what you get — so model the maintenance fee against your position size before anything else.
2Reviewers' own day-by-day figures show fees consuming the large majority of pool rewards once the discount-token balance runs out; small positions report a few cents a day or nothing at all, and one reviewer puts the payback period on a modest holding in years.
3The heavier problem is that money-paid-in-not-credited has stopped looking isolated.
4Through July it was automated AML holds, including one that froze bitcoin which had come from GoMining's own payouts, with the customer escalating to the FTC and the FBI's IC3.
5Mid-August then added three failures inside two weeks across three different rails rather than one stuck queue: a BTCB deposit over BNB Smart Chain that the reviewer documented as verifiably sitting on-chain, publishing both their assigned deposit address and the BscScan transaction ID, with support closing the ticket on copy-pasted FAQ text; a USDC purchase made through Mercuryo inside GoMining's own ecosystem where the payment cleared and the funds never arrived; and an account blocked behind an unusually broad document demand covering driving licence, national ID, proof of address and bank statement together.
6A fourth, posted 26 August, is the most serious of them because of what it alleges the company did after the fault rather than the fault itself.
7The reviewer says support agents conceded by email that the account was stuck in an 'uncommon situation', declined to refund, deferred repeatedly to 'experts looking into it', and actively contested his bank dispute while still acknowledging in writing that the underlying problem was unresolved.
8He then supplied a screenshot from his bank app showing the dispute had officially closed, and says the agent changed her story within four minutes and reverted to the generic referral.
9Contesting a chargeback on a fault you have admitted is a different allegation from slow support, and it is unusually checkable for a review — named agents, an email trail, a timestamped reversal.
10As of the 31 August 2026 collection pass, none of the four is recorded as resolved, and no new complaint has arrived to extend the cluster either.
11That matters in a specific way rather than a reassuring one: a fortnight has now passed with the most serious allegations on this profile publicly unanswered.
12The 20 August entry is a weaker story against the company — an account taken over by someone who set a substitute withdrawal address, discovered only after roughly two years locked out — but it does show that a compromised account here can be drained through a changed payout address without the owner noticing.
13Against all this the positive reviews are real and not all thin: multi-year users holding meaningful hashrate report routine withdrawals, so this is not an operation that takes deposits and disappears.
14Discount two things while reading the negatives — several one-star entries steer readers toward a named rival platform, which is advertising rather than testimony, and the regulator alert circulating against 'gomining-network-trade.com' names an impersonator domain rather than this company, though its existence tells you clones of this brand are actively being used to defraud people.
15Note too that no Trustpilot score is currently on file despite 764 reviews, so the aggregate is not something to lean on here.
16Recommend caution: size the maintenance fee against your holding before you buy, lock the withdrawal address down and check the account regularly, and treat the crediting failures as an open problem rather than a backlog.
response.log — Company ResponseCompany website ↗
17// No response from the company yet.
Public Thoughts0 comments
>No comments yet — be the first.
Sign in to comment on GoMining.Log in / Sign up