Most Recent Mention
Bitcointalk"[Quote from: Shishir99 on August 27, 2025, 10:34:06 AM](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5534176.msg65739212#msg65739212) Well, I see the thread is pretty much old now. I didn't check if I had commented before.…"
Subscribers monitoring OneMiners see every mention as it happens, not just the latest one — see what Monitor Company unlocks ↗
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-Cooled
ASIC Hydro-CooledLocations
- office — Sugar Land, United States(exact)
Houston-area showroom/office — same address as the hosting facility (12626A Dairy Ashford Rd, Sugar Land, TX) — the page's own heading calls it "OneMiners USA HQ & ASIC Center," a second "USA HQ" claim alongside the separate Austin HQ claim (a real inconsistency in the company's own marketing, not resolved here). Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named Google Business Profile "OneMiners Bitcoin Mining Showroom" (category: Hardware Shop) at this exact address, linked to oneminers.com — independent, verified corroboration for the showroom/office function specifically.
Source ↗ - facility — Sugar Land, United States(approximate)
Houston-area hosting facility (45MW, 4.05 EH/s) — 12626A Dairy Ashford Rd, Sugar Land, TX 77478 (the "Dairy Ashford Data Center"). Independently, extensively documented as a real 15,995 sq ft commercial/data-center-classified building via multiple CRE sources (LoopNet, Colliers, Crexi, PropertyShark, Showcase.com). Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): a real Google Business Profile exists at this address ("OneMiners Bitcoin Mining Showroom," category Hardware Shop — see the office row for that listing) — but it describes a retail/showroom presence, not a data-center/hosting operation specifically, so it doesn't independently confirm the mining-facility claim itself. Facility tenancy remains self-claimed only.
Source ↗ - office — Brooklyn, United States(exact)
Brooklyn, NY showroom/office (194 Malcolm X Blvd, Store 1, Brooklyn, NY 11221) — a small consultation/showroom space, not a mining facility. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named Google Business Profile "OneMiners - New York Office" (category: Hardware Shop) at this exact address, linked to oneminers.com, phone +1 646-423-4889. This supersedes the earlier "self-embedded directions link only" finding — a genuine, independently-discoverable, claimed listing exists here.
Source ↗ - facility — Alta, Norway(reported)
Norway (Arctic) hosting facility; capacity varies across the company's own pages (7.5MW operational/15MW incoming; 36MW; 6MW in different snippets — internal inconsistency). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: only PR-wire coverage found (digitaljournal.com/pr and a GlobeNewswire piece syndicated via financialcontent.com — both company-issued press releases, not independent journalism). OneMiners' own materials name this site "Alta, Norway" (not "Tromso," corrected here) and separately "Norway Arctic." No independent business listing, registry, or address found. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match.
Source ↗ - office — Miami, United States(exact)
Miami-area showroom — ADDRESS CONFLICT, unresolved. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named, reviewed Google Business Profile "OneMiners - Bitcoin Mining USA" (category: Hardware Shop) at 7535 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL 33156 (Floor 1, Dadeland Mall) — moved the pin here since this is the strongest evidence tier (independently-found, claimed, reviewed listing). This CONFLICTS with OneMiners' own current dedicated showroom page (oneminers.com/pages/usa-showroom-in-miami), which describes a DIFFERENT address: 1455 NW 107th Ave, Doral, FL 33172 (Miami International Mall). Likely explanation: a relocation the Google listing hasn't been updated to reflect (common — Business Profile addresses often lag a real move), though it's also possible these are two distinct showrooms at different times. Not independently resolved which is current; a human should check both addresses before relying on either for anything time-sensitive.
Source ↗ - office — Prague, Czechia(exact)
Czechia office/showroom — Rostovská 260/2b, Prague 10-Vršovice, 110 00. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named Google Business Profile "OneMiners - Bitcoin Mining and Hosting" at this exact address — 4.7 stars, 24 reviews, linked to oneminers.com, phone +1 607-900-9004. This is independent, verified corroboration (a claimed/reviewed listing, not a self-embedded directions link) — supersedes the earlier weaker pcpraha.cz evidence.
Source ↗ - office — Austin, United States(exact)
Austin, Texas HQ (CIRCLEHASH LLC, 701 Tillery St). 701 Tillery St, Unit 12, Austin TX 78702 is Createscape Coworking, a shared/flexible coworking space — a real, checkable address, but a shared mail-drop/virtual office, not a dedicated CircleHash-owned building. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named Google Business Profile "Circlehash LLC" (category: Computer hardware manufacturer) at this exact address — 2503, 701 Tillery St #12 — linked to circlehash.com, phone +1 607-900-8772. Independent, verified corroboration of the entity/address pairing (though the coworking-space caveat above still applies to the nature of the space itself).
Source ↗ - office — Ajman, United Arab Emirates(reported)
UAE — OneMiners' own site claims a "Dubai" facility (34MW, 3.06 EH/s), but the only address evidence found anywhere is in Ajman, a different emirate about 50km from Dubai: "Sheikh Rashed Bin Saeed Al Maktoum Road, C1 Building, Ajman Free Zone." Ajman Free Zone is a standard low-cost company-registration hub — a registered address there does not imply an operating mining facility, and this address wasn't found via a clean independent source (aggregated from OneMiners' own Dubai page plus general search snippets). No real-estate listing, directory, or news source confirms an actual facility in either Dubai or Ajman. Reclassified from facility to office, city corrected from Dubai to Ajman, full 5-phase verification (blind maps + guided maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fuzzy-matched an unrelated business ("Miners Hub - Head Office," minershub.ae, a different IT support company in Dubai) — no OneMiners/CircleHash listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — São Paulo, Brazil(guessed)
Brazil hosting facility (26MW, 2.34 EH/s; country — using São Paulo). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence found anywhere — not listed in Baxtel/DataCenterMap, no address published even on OneMiners' own site, no news/registry/real-estate hit. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fuzzy-matched an unrelated, unclaimed business ("Mine One By One," a different corporate office at Rua Hannemann 415, São Paulo) — no OneMiners/CircleHash listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — Toronto, Canada(guessed)
Canada hosting facility (36MW, 3.24 EH/s; country — using Toronto). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence. Notably, OneMiners' own general footprint summary lists only "USA, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Norway, Finland, and Dubai" — Canada is absent from that self-description, an internal inconsistency casting doubt on whether this is even a claim the company reliably makes. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fell back to the Prague listing (nearest global OneMiners match) plus an unrelated "Probe Mines Limited" — no Toronto-specific listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — Beijing, China(guessed)
China hosting facility (288MW, 25.92 EH/s; country — using Beijing) — CAUTION: China has banned crypto mining nationwide since 2021; no independent corroboration found for this claim Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search surfaced only unrelated fuzzy matches ("MINE," "Part Miner Inc. Beijing Office," "MINER") — no OneMiners/CircleHash listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — Helsinki, Finland(guessed)
Finland hosting facility (22MW, 1.98 EH/s; country — using Helsinki). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence. OneMiners' own Finland subpage states 1MW vs. 22MW on the overview page — an internal inconsistency on the company's own site. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match.
Source ↗ - facility — Lagos, Nigeria(guessed)
Nigeria hosting facility (33MW, 2.97 EH/s; region — using Lagos) — independent dispute: Proto/Block Inc. denied an OneMiners order tied to this claim (see docs/PROJECT_MEMORY.md) Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fuzzy-matched an unrelated business ("InnoMines Limited," innomines.co, a different exporter) — no OneMiners/CircleHash listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — Atlanta, United States(guessed)
Georgia, US hosting facility (34MW, 3.06 EH/s; state — using Atlanta, not a company-specified city). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence. Data-quality flag: older OneMiners content states 20MW for this site vs. 34MW on the current overview page, and 34MW/3.06 EH/s exactly matches the figures separately listed for Dubai/Ajman on the same page — consistent with copy-paste boilerplate, not independently confirmed capacity. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match — Maps fell back to showing the state itself.
Source ↗ - facility — Addis Ababa, Ethiopia(guessed)
Ethiopia hosting facility (40MW, 3.6 EH/s; region — using Addis Ababa). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence — only OneMiners' own posts plus a content-farm mirror (topbitcoinminers.com) restating the same claim verbatim. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match — Maps fell back to showing the city itself.
Source ↗ - facility — Asuncion, Paraguay(guessed)
Paraguay hosting facility (12MW, 1.08 EH/s; country — using Asuncion). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence. OneMiners' own Paraguay subpage states 2MW vs. 12MW on the overview page — an internal inconsistency. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match.
Source ↗ - facility — Columbia, United States(guessed)
South Carolina, US hosting facility (68MW, 6.12 EH/s; state — using Columbia, not a company-specified city). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence. The company's own copy also describes SC as a separate, "continuously building" 150MW facility elsewhere on the same page — suggesting this capacity may be aspirational/planned rather than confirmed-operational. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Zero results of any kind, not even a fuzzy match — Maps fell back to showing the state itself.
Source ↗ - facility — Dallas, United States(guessed)
Texas, US hosting facility (65MW, 5.85 EH/s; state — using Dallas, not a company-specified city). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence; not listed in any Dallas-area data-center directory (Baxtel, datacentermap.com, datacenters.com). Reads as marketing padding beside the real, separately-documented Sugar Land/Houston-area site ("redundancy within Texas... given ERCOT grid stress events") with no operational specifics of its own. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fell back to the Prague listing (nearest global OneMiners match) — no Dallas-specific listing exists.
Source ↗ - facility — Wichita, United States(guessed)
Kansas, US hosting facility (24MW, 2.16 EH/s; state — using Wichita, not a company-specified city). Full 5-phase verification (blind Maps + guided Maps + 3rd-party search) run 2026-07-11: zero independent evidence — OneMiners' own Kansas page never actually names Wichita or any city; copy is generic state tax-policy marketing (SB 98 exemption language), not an operational description. Not listed among Wichita's known data-center operators. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): Search fell back to the Prague listing (nearest global OneMiners match) — no Kansas-specific listing exists.
Source ↗
🔍🐸 DYORA-
Checked against ScamAdviser, IOSCO, UK FCA, US SEC PAUSE, US CFTC RED -- clean across all four regulator lists, ScamAdviser rated "Very Likely Safe (weighted down)".
DYOR the frog reads whatever third-party sources are configured for this score (see the DYOR section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
- ScamAdviser:3.5/5(Very Likely Safe (weighted down))· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
- Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Jul 20, 2026view ↗
- Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Jul 20, 2026view ↗
- Site History:4.0/5(since 2021)· checked Jul 20, 2026view ↗
Google Search SummaryC
OneMiners (legal name Circlehash LLC) has a generally decent 4/5 Trustpilot rating (84 reviews) with many customers praising responsive WhatsApp support and reliable hosting, but there is also a detailed, serious fraud allegation from a customer claiming a $21,846 loss on Proto Rig pre-orders, asserting Proto/Block Inc. never authorized or received any such order and calling it a scam; other users echo concerns about remote shutdowns of miners when customers complain. The mixed picture — solid aggregate rating alongside a credible, specific fraud allegation — warrants real caution.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "OneMiners reviews" ↗Bitcointalk SummaryF
A serious, extensively multi-source-corroborated red flag — this company already carried a BBB rating of F (not accredited) and a Google Search grade of C, and two separate, detailed Bitcointalk investigations substantially strengthen the case well beyond a single disputed complaint. A detailed customer report ("ONEMINERS EXPOSED," Feb 2026) describes a $21,846.20 loss on pre-ordered hosted-mining hardware never delivered; the hardware maker (Proto/Block Inc.) directly told the customer in writing that no such order was ever placed and called it a scam outright; OneMiners' dashboard showed fabricated mining activity later dismissed as a "software error"; and after the fraud was exposed, OneMiners deployed unauthorized replacement miners to the customer's dashboard without consent, apparently to fabricate a false delivery record. Separately, a months-long (March-July 2025), methodical investigation by multiple high-reputation "Legendary"-rank forum members found concrete, verifiable fraud in OneMiners' marketing: a "South Carolina facility" photo is a reverse-image-searched 2018 stock photo; another facility photo was stolen from a real company (EZ Blockchain); a "Finland" facility photo was stolen from another real company (Link Global Technologies); claimed office addresses show no signage on Google Street View; a claimed Changelly payment-gateway partnership was checked and found false; a "testimonial" was actually labeled "Sponsored Content"; and the claimed 2017 founding date contradicts the domain's actual 2024 WHOIS registration. The underlying entity traces to a real, small Czech PC-repair business, but the "leading global mining-hosting company since 2017" narrative built on top of it appears fabricated. A large network of shill/SEO-spam accounts promoting OneMiners across the forum was documented — several were subsequently banned or removed by forum moderators themselves. A related site, asicprofit.com, is repeatedly cross-referenced as run by the same operator/network; several other associated domains were also flagged (circlehash.com — OneMiners' actual registered LLC name — plus pcpraha.cz, minerboxes.com, iceriver.eu, mineasic.com, ibelink.io), none currently tracked separately. Against all this: OneMiners has real, ongoing hosted-ASIC-contract operations (confirmed via an April 2026 marketplace listing) and at least one genuine-seeming positive customer testimonial, though positive posts here warrant real caution given the documented, moderator-confirmed astroturf campaign. Net assessment: two independent, detailed, multi-contributor Bitcointalk investigations plus a third-party fraud confirmation from the hardware maker itself, on top of an already-known BBB F — this is one of the more thoroughly documented scam cases encountered in this research.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Bitcointalk for "OneMiners" ↗