Zpool

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsC

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:1.0/5(0%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2015)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.7★

3.7 from only 4 Trustpilot reviews — a sample far too small to be meaningful, and the average should not be read as a rating. The most useful review is the most recent and the most measured: a user of six or seven months who concludes the pool can be trusted for Bitcoin, while listing real friction — fee percentages fluctuating mostly between about 2% and 8% and at times higher, outages that felt frequent in some months, and wasted hashing time after systems resumed even though miners themselves kept running. That mix of a positive verdict with specific operational complaints is more informative than either a clean five stars or a flat dismissal. A second reviewer describes a delayed outbound transfer resolved quickly through a support ticket. The two negatives are short and unevidenced — one alleging displayed statistics did not match observed earnings, one simply reporting no payouts — and both are several years old. Four reviews across five years is not a basis for judgement. If you mine here, reconcile paid amounts against your own share statistics from the start and watch the fee percentage, since that is the point the one detailed reviewer flags.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC-

Upgraded from D. Zpool is a real, long-running multi-algorithm pool supporting over thirty algorithms, with no registration required and payouts sent directly to the Bitcoin address used as the username; guaranteed payout currencies are BTC, LTC, DASH, DGB and KMD, with daily BTC payouts above a 0.0021 threshold. The complaints are about predictability rather than honesty: an advertised 2% fee that users report fluctuating between roughly 2% and 8% and occasionally higher, periodic outages costing productive time on resumption, and daily payout figures that reviewers found hard to reconcile day to day. No fraud allegation, withheld-balance pattern or impersonation signal surfaced, which is what a D implies and this record does not support. Billing transparency and uptime consistency are the live concerns for a smart-mining pool where the payout maths is already hard to verify independently.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC (limited data)

See the review-angle row — judged across both angles together. This angle is a complete collision: 'zpool hosting' matched r/homelab and r/zfs threads about ~100TB raidz2 arrays, ZFS mounts inside jails, RAM prices and a pool corrupted by simultaneous Proxmox/TrueNAS writes. Not one result concerns the mining pool.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.