ValueHash

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:4.9/5(98%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2018)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary4.3★

4.3 from only 7 Trustpilot reviews — too small a base to establish reliability, so the detail matters more than the average. All seven are positive, and several are from customers with real tenure: one reports 18 months of hosting, another about a year, another several months of consistent uptime. Three points recur. Pricing is described as among the most competitive available, on a single flat monthly hosting fee. Communication is described as prompt and substantive, with the two brothers who run the business named repeatedly and reachable directly. And administration is described as unusually tidy — detailed invoicing, with serial numbers of purchased units supplied without being asked, which is a small but genuinely useful transparency signal since it lets a customer verify exactly which hardware they own. One reviewer drove 1,200 miles to tour the facility and met the operators in person; another describes onboarding as the deciding factor after shopping several providers, specifically because questions were answered rather than deflected. The one substantive limitation raised by a customer is the absence of a remote management solution — owners cannot administer their own rigs directly and must go through support, which reviewers say is responsive but is still a dependency. Worth confirming whether that has changed. Seven reviews, no negatives, and a young record: promising, but verify current terms yourself.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryA-

Consistently positive Trustpilot record for valuehash.com (7 reviews): reviewers specifically cite stable power/internet, straightforward billing with no hidden fees, competitive kWh rates, and quick professional support — including one customer hosting for 18 months with no complaints. No negative reports found.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit Summary

ZERO. Eight captures across all three angles between 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-28, and nothing anywhere names this company. The collision is almost entirely with software, not with mining. "valuehash" is a real Clojure library for hashing data structures with value semantics (r/Clojure, 18 votes), and the phrase pulls in r/algorithms on 64-bit key/value hashmaps, r/typescript on deterministic value hashing, r/crypto on PRVHASH, r/ruby on multi-value hashes, r/cpp_questions on chained hash tables, r/redteamsec, and a long run of r/PowerShell scripting threads. The mining-adjacent hits are phrase accidents of a different kind — an r/EtherMining thread asking for the best miner "for value/hash rate", and r/BitcoinMining threads on ASIC mixes and reliable hosts where the recommendations name EastCoastAsic, Wildcat Nebraska and Wilson Mining rather than this company. Twenty distinct results discarded. The only trace of the company itself is a u/valuehash account with 1 karma and no posts, which is not evidence about anything. reddit_grade stays null. Worth noting for future rotations: this name will keep colliding with a well-known software library, so a name-specific variant would be needed before any future ZERO here means more than it does today.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.