Upstream Data

⚖️ RegulatoryD

Checked against 5 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• Federal Court Records:2.0/5(3 cases)· checked Sep 1, 2026view ↗

  3 federal court records matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. Upstream Data Inc." (District Court, E.D. Texas, filed 2025-07-24); "Crusoe Energy Systems, LLC v. Upstream Data Inc." (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, filed 2025-06-16); "Upstream Data Inc. v. Crusoe Energy Systems, LLC" (District Court, D. Colorado, filed 2023-05-18). Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:4.6/5(91%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2013)· checked Aug 22, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryB

Upstream Data has a positive industry standing as a pioneer in off-grid, flare-gas-powered Bitcoin mining since 2016, with favorable coverage from industry publications (including Braiins). Its litigation history is offensive rather than defensive — it sued Crusoe Energy over a waste-gas mining patent, suggesting an established, defended IP position rather than a fraud signal. No complaints were found.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit Summary

Reddit search for "Upstream Data" on 2026-07-30 returned a full page of results and NOT ONE was about this company. The name collides with "upstream data" as an ordinary technical phrase — r/dataengineering (27), r/amateursatellites (6), r/satellites (5), r/quant (5). The phrase is common enough that quoting it does not isolate the company. Graded C at low confidence: no evidence either way, same substance as a search that found nothing. IMPORTANT — a high Reddit result count for this name means nothing, and re-running will not help, because the collision is in the name itself rather than in how the search was phrased. Note that quoting the query did NOT prevent this: Reddit fuzzy-matches when exact hits are scarce. Any future automated Reddit matching for this company needs a domain or a distinguishing second term, not the name alone.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.