TeraWulf

⚖️ RegulatoryD

Checked against 5 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• Federal Court Records:2.0/5(1 case)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗

  1 federal court record matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "Christman v. TeraWulf Inc." (District Court, W.D. New York, filed 2024-07-31). Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).

🛡️ Trust SignalsA

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:4.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2021)· checked Aug 20, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryD

TeraWulf faces an active 2026 lawsuit over a proposed data-center zoning classification near a lakeshore wildlife preserve (a court ruling allowed the challenge to proceed), and a short-seller report (Grizzly Research) alleging the company enriches insiders through undisclosed investor relationships and an unsustainable, highly dilutive financing structure ($500M+ issued via convertible notes and at-the-market stock sales since its 2021 IPO). The company does actively warn investors about unrelated scammers impersonating it.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC-

Reddit discussion of TeraWulf is heavy and consistently hostile, but it is community/neighbour sentiment rather than customer sentiment: roughly 18 threads in r/ithaca and r/upstate_new_york track the fight over its Cayuga Lake / Lansing data-centre project, with recurring accusations that the company misrepresented its water use and local job creation, a lawsuit against the zoning board, and a detailed 139-upvote thread arguing that a supposedly independent local news page was set up to run pro-TeraWulf coverage. Investor and stock chatter ($WULF on r/wallstreetbets, r/pennystocks, r/TerawulfStock) was discarded, as were unrelated "Tera" communities. No hosting or colocation customer experience appears anywhere, so this grade reflects reputational and community standing only, not service quality — and none of the complaints involve non-payment or fraud against customers.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.