Revolve Labs

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2023)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryB+

Revolve Labs (Colorado Springs; formerly Bit49, founded 2017; 20MW Minnesota facility) has consistently positive, specific first-hand hosting-customer accounts: fast miner inspection/install/repair on a $500k account move, power credits when uptime falls below 95%, and multiple reviewers praising communication and onboarding speed (miners running within 24 hours). No negative reports found.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC (limited data)

Very little, and what there is concerns the company's ASIC repair training rather than hosting. In a recent r/BitcoinMining thread a miner in Argentina asks whether RevolveLabs is still operating, saying they had heard its repair course is top-notch but that an email sent days earlier had gone unanswered and that everything findable online, Reddit included, is several years old. The replies split: one commenter confirms the company is still around, another says their site may simply be out of date, and a third — a vendor — has never heard of them. The only other trace is a set of 2024 posts offering 340 lightly-used Bitmain T19s for sale. So the reputation signal is positive but second-hand, the responsiveness signal is negative but slight, and there is no first-hand account of the service at all. C at low confidence: a genuinely middling, sparse record, with the caveat that a customer's most recent public experience was silence.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.