Musk Miners (Musk Mining LLC) hosts customer-purchased ASIC miners, including both air- and hydro-cooled Bitcoin and Litecoin/Dogecoin models, at flare-gas-powered facilities in West Texas and Louisiana with additional US sites planned. Hosting requires miners be purchased through Musk Miners directly, under a 12-month contract billed at 8 cents/kWh all-in.
Recent Activity
RedditMost recent mention
"Mushiness abandoned their Reddit account after promising refunds to customers. There's tons of evidence they've stolen from customers. They lost a court case last summer after suing one of their customers. In short…"
Subscribers monitoring Musk Miners receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-Cooled
ASIC Hydro-CooledLocations
- office — Grand Forks, USA(exact)
Grand Forks, North Dakota HQ
⚖️ Regulatory
Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
🛡️ Trust SignalsA+
Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Trustpilot Summary4.2★
4.2 from 20 Trustpilot reviews. The substantive positive reviews are the strongest signal here, because several come from customers describing three or more years of continuous business rather than a single transaction: reviewers report fast hardware sourcing and shipping (a test unit arriving in a week, four machines purchased and hashing within a day), competitive reseller pricing, and a team that answers detailed technical questions. Named staff recur across years of reviews, which is consistent with a stable operation. One review is unusual and worth flagging for what it is: a reviewer who signed an agreement, changed their mind, and was released without penalty, then posted a 5-star review reasoning that a company willing to do that must be legitimate. That is a reasonable inference about one interaction, not evidence about service delivery. One negative review alleges withdrawals being rejected with demands to buy higher-tier machines first. That description does not match this company's model — it sells and hosts hardware rather than operating an investment platform with a withdrawal function — and it matches the standard advance-fee pattern of impersonator sites trading on a real company's name. It is noted here rather than counted against the company, and it is a reminder to confirm you are dealing with the real business before sending funds. The review base is small at 20, so weight the multi-year accounts more heavily than the average.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 View on Trustpilot ↗
Google Search SummaryD
Musk Miners draws a highly polarized reputation: PissedConsumer reviewers describe the company as keeping payments, taking machines, and not returning calls or processing refunds, and one scanner gives it a very low trust score — but other sources describe mostly positive experiences and good customer service. The company clarifies it is unaffiliated with a separately-named entity, "MuskMining.cloud." Genuinely split evidence with a serious specific complaint pattern on one side.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "Musk Miners reviews" ↗Reddit SummaryD (limited data)
Everything this capture can read is positive, and that is exactly why the stored D is being kept rather than raised. WHAT IS READABLE. (1) r/BitcoinMining, 'Noob with two s21', 2 years old: a first-time miner hosting two S21 200T units says 'Right now I'm very happy with my arrangement', gives real numbers ($11k for the pair, $400/month all-in electricity, which a commenter works out to about $0.072/kWh), and names Musk Miners when another user asks who is hosting him. He also reports being invited to tour their nearest facility, though his own units ended up about 1,000 miles away because that site was not taking more machines at the time. The critical replies in that thread are about his HARDWARE purchase price and normal pool-hashrate variance, not about the host. (2) In the same thread an industry account replies 'I love @muskminers! They're good people!' — a peer rather than a customer, so weighted low. (3) r/cryptomining, 2 years old, in a general hosting-experiences thread: 'Musk Miners charge you a small amount of the electricity use', factual and neutral-to-positive. They also appear in an r/MiningHosting running list of North American hosts. WHAT IS NOT READABLE, AND WHY IT DECIDES THIS. The daemon skipped two substantial threads as 'unchanged, last read 2026-08-19' — an r/BitcoinMining 'Hosting -help' thread (15 comments) whose visible snippet is the warning 'Be extremely cautious with hosting companies. Visit the site before you put miners with them', and a 30-comment 'Revolution Mining - are they legit?' thread. A reader saw those a fortnight ago; this capture cannot. So the honest position is: on what is visible, Musk Miners looks like a small host with at least one genuinely satisfied customer and no complaint on file. That is not enough to overturn a stored D that a better-informed pass arrived at, and two positive mentions from 2024 cannot carry a grade upward on their own. THE GRADE THEREFORE STAYS D at low confidence. Anyone revisiting this should read the two deduped threads first — they, not this capture, are where the D came from.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "Musk Miners" ↗