MiningRigRentals

Average (2.7/5)https://www.miningrigrentals.com/
Google
Trustpilot score
1.8
BBB
⚖️ Regulatory
🛡️ Trust Signals
A+
Social Media

Recent Activity

Trustpilot
Reddit grade first recorded at 3 · 23 days ago

Most recent mention

"most of the rigs show a very high hashrates wanting hundreds of dollars per day but these rigs are not from the rig owner of that account but bought from nicehash which is cheaper using rainbow/awesome miner apps that…"

111 days ago· 1.0View source ↗

Subscribers monitoring MiningRigRentals receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗

BBB Profile

Accreditation: UnknownLetter rating: Complaints (3 yrs):

Mining Type

Cloud MiningCloud Mining

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

  • Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
  • Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
  • Site History:5.0/5(since 2014)· checked Aug 22, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary1.8

1.8 from 34 Trustpilot reviews. This is a rental marketplace rather than a mining operator, and almost every complaint traces to the same structural point: the platform matches renters with third-party rig owners, and reviewers say it does not effectively police what those owners advertise. The consistent allegation is that delivered hashrate does not match listed hashrate. Reviewers report rented rigs producing a fraction of the advertised shares, high rejection rates, hashrate dropping to zero mid-rental, rigs that were simply non-functional, and roughly one bad rental in three. Several say refunds were refused on the basis that the fault lay with the rig, not the platform, and that support declined to intervene even where the rig owner's behaviour looked deliberate. One reviewer describes a more specific mechanism worth knowing about: that some listings are not backed by physical rigs at all but by hashrate bought more cheaply from NiceHash and resold through profit-switching software, so the renter pays a large multiple of the underlying cost. The complaints are about counterparty risk inside a marketplace, which is a different risk profile from a hosting provider failing directly — but the practical outcome reviewers describe is the same. Verify hashrate independently against your pool's own reporting from the start of any rental, and treat listed figures as claims.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

🔍 View on Trustpilot ↗

Google Search SummaryC-

A hashpower rental marketplace operating since 2014, so the business itself is long-established rather than a fly-by-night. The customer record is poor: Trustpilot sits near 2 out of 5, with 2026 reviewers reporting rigs that keep crashing and a platform they feel is built around rig owners rather than renters, and a Ripoff Report complaint alleging a rig was rented without payment. Much of the harsher language concerns rental economics rather than misappropriation — several 'scam' claims resolve into the argument that renting returns less than simply buying coin. Transparency is a genuine weakness: no published ownership or physical address, and scanners flag the low trust score accordingly. Site traffic is reported down around 62% as of May 2026. Held at C-: a real marketplace with a real user base and no corroborated non-payment pattern, set against consistently weak satisfaction and thin corporate disclosure.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

🔍 Search Google for "MiningRigRentals reviews" ↗

Reddit SummaryC (limited data)

One genuine mention in this capture and it is positive, but it is a passing aside rather than a review. In r/NiceHash 'Nicehash holding my funds for nearly 3 weeks' (7mo) a customer describes NiceHash demanding identity documents on a hashrate purchase, then withholding his refund for three weeks and closing the ticket as SOLVED; he closes by noting 'The company I switched to, Mining Rig Rentals, has given me no grief.' That is unprompted and comparative, which makes it more credible than a solicited review, but it attests only that withdrawals worked for one user. The other two results yield nothing: r/Ravencoin 'Anyone here rent their rig out?' is someone explicitly asking for a review of MiningRigRentals and receiving no answer about it (the two replies are an unrelated hardware-sharing offer and 'Nicehash is effectively the same thing'), and 'Mining Rig Rentals Worker IP addresses: 2021' is an operational reference post in the company's own r/MiningRigRentals subreddit. Held at the stored C: this capture alone is thin and positive, but it sits against a documented mixed history on the platform - the same result set surfaces a 34-vote r/MoneroMining thread titled 'Proof that MiningRigRentals Sellers Are Reselling NiceHash Hashpower (RandomX)', and separate captures for other companies record a user reporting that MiningRigRentals 'will fight you' over refunds on underperforming rigs while another says they have always been refunded. C with low confidence is the honest reading of a marketplace whose experience depends on which seller you rent from.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

🔍 Search Reddit for "MiningRigRentals" ↗