Mining-Dutch

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:3.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2016)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.2★

A single 1-star review from April 2026 is the only Trustpilot coverage on file. The reviewer alleges coins went missing from their wallets, and ties it to the pool's payout rules: that a minimum balance must be reached before bitcoin can be withdrawn, and that balances expire after roughly six months, which they characterise as the pool keeping the coins. They also note that at their hashrate the yield was around a cent a day, which is what made the minimum unreachable in the time available. The account is hard to read in places and impossible to verify from the text alone, but the mechanism it describes is a concrete, checkable policy question rather than a vague accusation — a payout minimum combined with an expiry window on unpaid balances will strand small miners' earnings by design, whatever the intent. Anyone considering mining here at low hashrate should confirm the current minimum payout threshold and whether unpaid balances expire, before pointing hashrate at it. One review is not a verdict, and the 3.2 TrustScore built on it carries no weight either way.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC-

A registered Dutch multi-algorithm pool operating since 2018, supporting 30+ algorithms with auto-exchange to BTC, LTC and USDT, PPLNS/PPS/PROP payout options, 15-minute payout cycles and no withdrawal fee beyond on-chain costs. The criticism is real but bounded: miners describe the total cost as higher than it first appears once the roughly 2% pool fee, the additional auto-exchange charge and transfer costs are stacked, and there is at least one report of coins missing from a wallet balance alongside frustration at minimum-withdrawal thresholds. No regulator action, court record or fraud allegation surfaced, and the operator is a registered, identifiable business. Raised from D to C- — this pass found fee opacity and isolated complaints, which is the mixed-signals band, not the significant-negative-signals band the previous grade asserted.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC+ (limited data)

See the review-angle row — judged across both angles together. This angle collided ('mining' matched r/mining, which explicitly excludes crypto hashing; 'hosting' matched web-hosting subs and a Red Dead Redemption NAT-error thread) and added only a 9-year-old r/thehempcoin tutorial naming mining-dutch.nl as the only THC pool.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.