Mining Colocation is a Canada-based ASIC hosting provider charging by the kilowatt-month (roughly $99-$169/kW-month depending on hardware) with ambient-air-cooled facilities and a minimum one-year hosting agreement. It also sells mining hardware directly and offers VPN access for larger hosting clients.
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-CooledLocations
⚖️ Regulatory
Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
🛡️ Trust SignalsA-
Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Google Search SummaryC
A Quebec operator running three hydroelectric-powered mining facilities and reselling Bitmain hardware. Its published terms are more specific than most in this batch: it commits to refunding months in which uptime falls below 95% where the downtime is attributable to its own systems, and states that malfunctioning or broken miners are returned to the customer at the customer's discretion with shipping at the customer's cost. Search surfaced no litigation, no regulator findings and no substantive independent customer reviews in either direction; the only third-party signal is a scanner placing the domain at medium risk. Held at C: a real, located operator with hydro power and a written uptime commitment, but effectively no external evidence about how it performs in practice.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "Mining Colocation reviews" ↗Reddit SummaryC- (limited data)
One genuine mention, and it is nine years old. In an r/BitcoinCA thread titled 'Mining vendors in Canada - Reviews/experience?' (4 votes, 23 comments), a customer writes: 'I've purchased miner hosting through miningcolocation.com They are all setup and running since December 1.' The domain is stated explicitly, so the entity is confirmed rather than inferred — this is our listing, not the generic phrase 'mining colocation'. The sentiment is positive but minimal: machines were deployed and running, and nothing is said about pricing, uptime over time, support or exit terms. IMPORTANT LIMIT ON THIS READ: the daemon did not open that thread. Only its title, vote count and the one visible snippet are on file, so the 23 comments — which may contain the actual discussion of this vendor — have not been read. The single thread the daemon did open, r/ASICMinerHosting's two-day-old 'Welcome' post, contains no mention of this company at all; it is a new subreddit's rules post asking members what they pay per kWh, and is worth noting only as a venue that may carry evidence in future. The rest of the capture is collision: 'colocation'/'server' matched a long tail of game-server threads (r/Metin2, r/GTARP, r/classicwowera, r/battlefield_4) that have nothing to do with mining. GRADE: stored C- affirmed, not moved. There is no negative signal here at all, but neither is there enough to raise a grade — one positive snippet from 2017, with the surrounding discussion unread, cannot carry a B-band verdict, and nothing justifies lowering it either. Confidence LOW, which is the honest reading: this company's grade currently rests on a single decade-old sentence.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "Mining Colocation" ↗