MillionMiner

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:4.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2021)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary4.2★

4.2 from 129 Trustpilot reviews. The positive majority is consistent on sales and support: reviewers describe competitive quotes, named agents who stay reachable (Louise and Rastislav are both thanked repeatedly, one for accommodating a customer outside working hours), on-time DDP delivery, quick replies to status chasers, and an app that lets owners see their machines running. Several are explicitly first-time buyers who say they were steered to a machine inside their budget rather than upsold, and at least one reports a Bitmain warranty problem taken up on the customer's behalf. Two recent reviewers volunteer that their own experience did not match the complaints they had read. The negatives are fewer but far more detailed, and they cluster on money and on hardware that does not do what was sold. One reviewer says he sent 6,500 USDT for a Monero miner, was told after payment that the unit was not in stock, requested a refund immediately and had heard nothing two weeks later. Another describes paying for a machine and then being told by the tech team that there was a problem, with two months of 'mining' in quotation marks because the rig was never earning as sold. A third ordered a KS5M in May 2024 on a stated one-month delivery and found it was actually a pre-order. The heaviest case is a customer who lost about $15,000 through Endless Power Solutions in Dubai, the hosting partner MillionMiner recommended; after more than eight months he reported a resolution he called somewhat fair and raised his rating from one star, withdrawing his accusation of dishonesty. Two things to weigh when reading the score. A large share of the positives are one-line entries clustered tightly by date, which is the signature of an active review-solicitation programme - that does not make them false, but the average rests on short, low-detail reviews while the complaints are long and specific. And the profile churns: successive readings here have moved in both directions on both score and count, so reviews are being removed as well as added and any single reading is a snapshot rather than a trend. Disputes on this page do tend to end in refunds or settlements, but the ones that involve hosting through a recommended partner have taken months.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryB-

Trustpilot carries a rating in the mid-4s and search turns up no regulator action or fraud reporting. The substantive negatives are hosting-side billing complaints from the period the hosting was run through Endless Power Solutions - charges during downtime, approximate rather than per-machine metering, and one reviewer describing being threatened with unplugging during a dispute, later updated to resolved - plus scattered reports of miners underperforming or failing early. The company states it has since moved to metered per-machine billing with downtime deducted automatically. Held at B-: real, dated complaints but with visible remediation and no unresolved fraud signal in search.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryD

MIXED, net negative — moved from the stored C- to D on evidence that did not exist when C- was written. Nine captures across all three angles between 2026-08-14 and 2026-08-28 surface about seven genuine threads; confidence MEDIUM. The decisive material is two threads posted by the same customer in the week before this pass — r/MoneroMining "Millionminer are scammers" (23 votes) and r/BitcoinMining "Millionminer my experience with these scammers" (17 comments). The account is specific: 6,500 USDT paid for a miner the site listed as available, followed by being told the product was not in stock, followed by fourteen days of refund excuses ("the finance department is processing", "24-48 hours"). Two things happened next, and both matter. First, the OP updated both posts: soon after posting publicly the company called, refunded in full, apologised and offered a $300 coupon. The money came back — this is not an unresolved non-payment case, and it must not be reported as one. Second, and more damaging, the complaint drew independent corroboration of the underlying practice from two named industry operators. One reports being lured by the listing of a Bitdeer SealMiner A4 Ultra and being warned off by a third operator on the ground that the A4 was not available and Bitdeer had not even committed to a release date. A California-licensed hosting operator replies that they told the same enquirer the machine was "vaporware — they don't exist", and lists the sub-$9,000 Z15 Pro and A4 Pro Ultra hydro as similarly not legitimate. A separate commenter reports the same pattern on a cancelled Monero ASIC, and a fourth notes the LinkedIn footprint is an eight-person operation. That is the finding: a recurring, independently corroborated practice of listing and taking payment for hardware that does not yet exist, with refunds obtainable but slow and, in the documented case, only after public pressure. Older threads fit the same shape — r/MiningRig "Pleas do not order from millionminer.com!" and r/EtherMining "Is MillionMiner a trustworthy online shop for ASICs?" (12 comments), both three years old. D rather than F because the one fully documented case ended in a full refund with an apology, and there is no Reddit report of money permanently lost. D rather than the stored C- because "genuinely mixed" no longer describes a record in which the only recent first-hand accounts are two scam posts and the corroboration comes from competitors with nothing to gain by lying about a specific unreleased SKU. One further note a reader should weigh: a commenter in the same thread argues the company's Trustpilot profile is calibrated rather than clean — "it wasn't too good, it actually had just about the right number of disgruntled customers that you would expect for a large seller" — which is consistent with our own observation that the Trustpilot count fell from 135 to 128 while the score rose from 4.0 to 4.2 in a single week. Buy nothing here without confirming the specific SKU physically exists and is in stock, in writing.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.