IQ Mining

⚖️ RegulatoryF-

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:1.0/5(Listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  IQ Mining IS named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal — TWICE, by two separate regulators: "IQMining" via Ukraine’s National Securities and Stock Market Commission (2024-05-23), and "https://iqmining.com/" (the exact domain) via Spain’s Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (2024-04-05). The Spain entry’s exact-URL match leaves no doubt this is the same company. Scored 1.0/5 under this project’s pass/fail convention.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsB

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:1.5/5(Very Likely Unsafe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2006)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary1.2★

1.2 from 414 Trustpilot reviews — among the lowest scores in this directory on a substantial base, and the complaint pattern is both consistent and long-running. The overwhelming theme is that funds cannot be withdrawn. Reviewers describe withdrawal requests unanswered for periods measured in months and years: one reports requests raised in November 2024 still unpaid seven months later; another reports a BTC balance locked for over a year, with every attempt failing on an error and support returning the identical automated line — that the technical department is aware and fixing it — for the whole period. Others describe multi-year "technical problems" that only surface at withdrawal time, high transfer fees, no route to move coins to a personal wallet, and no way to close an account. The most severe allegations should be read as reviewer claims rather than established fact: one reviewer asserts the company is a "pig butchering" operation, that its stated UK location is false and its actual operations are in Asia, and that an FBI investigation is underway. Nothing on the profile substantiates that, and it is quoted here as an allegation, not a finding. One pattern worth knowing when reading this profile: a number of the 1-star reviews carry promotions for third-party "recovery" services or steer readers to alternative mining platforms. That is a well-known parasite pattern on distressed listings and should not be read as either corroboration or endorsement — the substantive withdrawal complaints stand on their own without it.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryF-

A cloud-mining operation registered in the Marshall Islands with no financial licence, no compensation fund and no published financial reporting. The complaint pattern across Trustpilot and independent review sites is consistent and multiply corroborated: payouts near zero, maintenance fees that roughly equal or exceed the payout so a contract ends at a net loss, rules changed mid-contract, and a $10 withdrawal minimum that strands small balances — one reviewer reports $200 invested returning $2 over four months and therefore unwithdrawable. Multiple reviewers describe the structure as a Ponzi, and even some who were paid report receiving around 17% less than competitors with no explanation offered. A minority report smooth withdrawals and responsive staff. Graded F-: the failure type is the same across many unrelated reporters, the corporate structure is deliberately opaque, and the product concentrates exactly the risk the complaints describe.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryF

Second exact-angle capture, three days earlier, with the same result set and the same three deduped on-entity threads. Judged together with the 2026-08-30 capture — see that row. Worth recording that two sittings three days apart returned identical results and no new discussion: this company's Reddit record has been static for years.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.