Hashing24

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:2.0/5(Likely Unsafe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2016)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary2.5★

2.5 from 70 Trustpilot reviews. The complaints are consistent: fees applied at many points, mining output that reviewers say did not cover the investment, and withdrawals that were requested and never arrived, with support not responding afterwards. A minority of short positive reviews call the company reliable without detail. The weight of specific, first-person accounts sits on the negative side.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC

A long-running cloud-mining brand (roughly a decade, with Bitfury and Wattum named as infrastructure partners) whose search results are genuinely polarised: several review sites call it one of the more credible cloud-mining options, while others allege misleading website claims and report arbitrary contract terminations. No regulator action, court record or news reporting of fraud was found. The cloud-mining contract model itself is the recurring source of complaints rather than any single incident. Mixed signals with real complaints and no decisive evidence either way - C.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryD

Nearly a decade of Reddit threads about Hashing24 run in one direction, and it is not a good one. The recurring titles say it plainly — "Is Hashing24 scam or not?", "mining scam Hashing24.com", "Is hashing24 legit?", a r/CryptoScams entry, and a 2024 post headed "Hashing24 scamming me...". The substance behind them is narrower than the headlines: one customer reports buying more than twenty contracts across Genesis, Hashing24 and Giga-Watt and not recovering the initial investment, and another says the withdrawal fee of 0.0007 BTC — about €55 at the time — would swallow roughly half of what they had earned. Those are real grievances about contract economics and fee structure rather than proof of theft, and no one describes machines or balances simply vanishing. What positive material exists is promotional: an SEO piece titled "Trusted and Reliable Bitcoin Cloud Mining" that r/Bitcoin's moderators removed within about ninety minutes, plus two review-farm posts. The hosting angle returns nothing at all. D reflects consistent, long-running negativity that stops short of a corroborated fraud finding; the medium confidence reflects decent volume but very old evidence.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Bitcointalk SummaryD+

Hashing24 (Bitfury-partnered cloud mining) is the subject of a decade-spanning Bitcointalk scam-accusation thread (2016-2026, 85 replies). The original case was substantive: a checkable chronological lie in their marketing (claiming operations since 2012, before cloud mining existed as a category), and the CEO's ties to a separate site with near-identical About-Us copy, a pattern typical of that era's HYIP clone-mills. But real satisfied customers defended the company throughout the SAME thread across multiple years, and the most concrete complaint — two independent 2017-2018 reports of withdrawals being blocked right after auctioning off contracts — while credible, is limited to a specific scenario rather than a pattern of total non-payment. The company's website is confirmed live and actively operating as of mid-2026, consistent with genuine decade-long continuous operation rather than a Ponzi collapse. Net: a real, disputed reputation with genuine red flags on both sides, not a settled verdict either way.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.