Hamus Hosting

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:4.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2024)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary4.4★

4.4 from 32 Trustpilot reviews — one of the stronger profiles in this directory. Reviewers, including several hosting substantial fleets in Norway, describe fast reboots when a miner stops hashing, self-service tooling so customers can restart machines themselves, a cleaning service, and consistently responsive support, with named staff praised for setup help. One reviewer describes the whole chain handled for them end to end: purchase, shipping, customs clearance and installation at the facility. Two dissenting reviews, and they are different in kind. The older one is measured rather than hostile: rack-space fees described as abusive for small fleets and better folded into the electricity price, a deposit fee held for two years, and a compulsory two-year contract where other hosts require none — while still calling the service good and the communication fast. That reviewer moved new machines elsewhere but alleged no wrongdoing. The other is a one-star from August 2026 titled "Hamus and Arctic Hosting in war of roses - leave customers out in the cold", pointing at a dispute between the two operators that the reviewer says left customers stranded. Only the headline was captured here, not the body, so the substance of that claim is not on file and should not be weighed as though it were established. It is the one item worth reading directly on the live profile before committing machines.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryB-

A Netherlands-based hosting provider with data centres in the Netherlands and Norway and published tiered kWh pricing. Trustpilot feedback is mostly positive and includes multi-year customers describing problems handled honestly and professionally, with the recurring negative being rack-space fees charged on top of electricity, which smaller miners call disproportionate. No fraud allegations, regulator actions or payout disputes surfaced in search. Generally positive with a pricing-structure complaint rather than a trust problem - B-.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryB (limited data)

Reddit's entire record of Hamus Hosting is one post, and it is quietly favourable. A first-time buyer in r/BitcoinMining introduces the S21 Pro they have just bought and says it is going to Hamus at €0.075 per kWh, then asks the room whether low-power mode makes sense at that rate; the discussion that follows is about mining economics, not the host. The review angle returns nothing at all across four separate passes, and neither do repeated hosting-angle searches — no complaint about uptime, billing, repairs or payouts exists anywhere on Reddit. That absence is worth something in a market where unhappy customers are usually loud, but it is not the same as a positive record. The grade stands at B; the confidence is set to low because a single mention is all there is to support it.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.