Frontier Mining

⚖️ RegulatoryF-

Checked against 5 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• Federal Court Records:1.0/5(5 cases)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗

  5 federal court records matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "GRAHAM v. FRONTIER MINING, LLC" (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, filed 2025-02-20); "Frontier Mining & Materials, L.L.C." (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, filed 2014-10-03); "Michael Wilson & Partners, Limited" (District Court, D. Colorado, filed 2006-12-26); "FRONTIER MINING COMPANY INC" (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, filed 1983-05-06); "Frontier Mining Company Inc." (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, filed 1983-01-11). At least one appears to be a BANKRUPTCY proceeding. Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).

🛡️ Trust SignalsB

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:4.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:2.4/5(36%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2004)· checked Aug 24, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryD+

A Plano, Texas colocation and mining-management provider founded in 2018, hosting in Los Angeles and Nevada. The negative signals in search are specific and customer-side: a detailed account of roughly 20% downtime with no advance communication about state curtailment shutdowns and continuing outages afterwards, and a broader theme of the company outgrowing its ability to communicate. Employee reviews on Glassdoor add complaints that the company misrepresents things up front. No regulator action or court record found. Unresolved operational and communication complaints keep this in the D range.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit Summary

ZERO under the rubric: searched all three angles — exact ("Frontier Mining", 2026-08-30), review (2026-08-26) and hosting (2026-08-25) — and found no genuine customer evidence of any kind. reddit_grade stays null. This company is on this project's known-collision watch list and the captures confirm why. The exact and review angles returned essentially nothing but the mobile game Idle Miner Tycoon, whose in-game event is called the "Frontier Mine": seven of seven exact-angle results are r/IdleMinerTycoon strategy threads ("Frontier Mine Leaderboard", "Frontier mine strategy", "Frontier Mine Help"), and five of seven review-angle results are the same, including two free-to-play progress reviews of the game. Two of these had already been marked "judged noise" by an earlier pass for the right reason: the thread text never names the company. The remaining collisions are a Star Citizen guild called Frontier Defense Initiative (seven copies of one recruitment advert), Frontier Airlines and Frontier FiOS complaint threads, a DRC gold-mining investment pitch, r/Rockhounding, and a novelist being advised to cut the phrase "the frontier mining world of Bane's World" from a book blurb. Twenty-four discarded in total, and not one of them concerns an ASIC hosting business. Three results across all three angles do genuinely name our company, and they are why this needed reading rather than pattern-matching — but none of them is a customer report: 1. "Anyone heard of Frontier Mining company?" (r/Bitcoin, five years ago). The poster says only "Thinking about hosting ASIC's from them". It drew one comment, from u/frontiermining itself: "Happy to share a little bit more about what we do. Feel free to ping us at team@frontiermining.co." Nobody with experience of the company replied, then or since. 2. "Wattum vs. Frontier Mining hosting" (r/BitcoinMining, five years ago, 28 comments). The thread is genuinely about our company, but the only material the search surfaced from it concerns Wattum — "I know guys that mine with wattum and have had major communication issues" — and the thread was not re-opened this pass, so no comment about Frontier Mining is on file. 3. "Looking for miners and hosting" (r/BitcoinMining, five years ago, 31 comments), where the surfaced content is a third party's hosting sales pitch at $0.089/kWh rather than anything about this company. So the honest finding is narrower than "nothing was found" and worth stating precisely: the company's name appears on Reddit, its own marketing account is present, and at least one prospective customer asked about it publicly — but across five years there is not a single comment from anyone reporting having used it. Uptime, support, billing, payouts, hardware handling: no evidence in either direction. Grading that would mean inventing a verdict, so no grade is assigned and no confidence is recorded, per the rubric's ZERO bucket. One note for a future pass: the two five-year-old r/BitcoinMining threads (28 and 31 comments) were skipped as unchanged and could in principle still contain a customer account. If this company is revisited, opening those two threads specifically is the highest-value action available — everything else the name returns is game, airline, telecom or fiction.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.