F2Pool

🔍🐸 DYORA+

Not yet checked against any DYOR sources.

DYOR the frog reads whatever third-party sources are configured for this score (see the DYOR section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Jul 19, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2013)· checked Jul 18, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Jul 19, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryB

F2Pool is one of the oldest mining pools (founded 2013) with a strong industry reputation and reported 99%+ uptime, but Trustpilot shows a middling 2.7 rating from a small sample, with complaints about lower-than-competitor payouts, OFAC transaction filtering, and slow (72+ hour) support for non-Chinese speakers. Website traffic has reportedly declined significantly. Overall it is a well-established, legitimate pool with real but non-disqualifying complaints.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryB-

A major, long-established mining pool (since 2013) frequently cited in serious protocol discourse — a Stratum V2 Working Group member, Bitcoin Roundtable signatory, EIP-1559 discussion participant. No scam or non-payment complaints found. The real recurring criticism is centralization risk: a widely-discussed post noted F2Pool + Bitmain-owned pools controlling 62% of hashrate (Nakamoto Coefficient dropped to 2), and its large periodic BTC outflows draw market-manipulation speculation (disputed, not confirmed). One historical resolved issue: an 11-year-old thread flagged F2Pool briefly mining invalid blocks after a BIP66 rule change, fixed quickly (confirmed in the same thread). Google Search grade B / Trustpilot 3.5 are consistent with this — a legitimate, technically reputable operator with governance/centralization concerns, not a trust/fraud problem.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.