F2Pool

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2013)· checked Aug 26, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(100%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.4★

3.4 from 14 Trustpilot reviews, on a small and noisy base — several entries carry no real content. The substantive complaints concern policy rather than reliability: manual withdrawals below the minimum payout being discontinued, a reviewer reporting roughly 15% lower rewards than a comparison pool, and objection to transaction filtering against OFAC sanctions lists. Positive reviewers describe it as trustworthy and easy to use without going into specifics.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC+

Upgraded from C on transparency, with the main criticism now historical. F2Pool is one of the largest Bitcoin pools (around 16% of network hashrate) and openly publishes fees, rewards, payout schedules and pool hashrate and revenue data, which is better disclosure than most of the field. Fees sit at the higher end — roughly 2% for PPLNS up to about 4% for FPPS, versus 1-2% at some competitors — so miners pay for that scale. The significant criticism is from 2023, when F2Pool began filtering transactions involving addresses sanctioned by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, excluding them from its blocks; this drew substantial community backlash as a censorship-resistance failure, and F2Pool subsequently halted the filtering patch. No current customer complaint pattern surfaced. A large, transparent, comparatively expensive pool that has already reversed its one serious governance misstep.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryB-

Long-established pool (operating since 2013, 40+ proof-of-work networks) with a real but near-dormant official subreddit r/f2pool (48 weekly visitors, 0 weekly contributions). Genuine customer traffic across the exact/review/hosting angles is routine support friction rather than grievance: 'Error Connecting to pool', 'Change BTC withdraw address on F2Pool sub-account', 'I can't mine!!!!' - all low-vote, low-comment threads. No non-payment, withheld-withdrawal or fraud allegation appears anywhere in these captures. The one substantial critical thread, r/ethereum's 'F2Pool is setting a dangerous precedent by applying Bitcoin principles to Ethereum' (54 votes, 201 comments), is a 2016 protocol-governance argument about fork behaviour rather than a customer-service complaint, and is not treated as conduct evidence of the insolvency/enforcement kind. Stored B- is affirmed rather than moved: the evidence found is consistent with mostly-positive-with-minor-gripes, and the strongest review threads' bodies were not captured this pass, which is not a basis for revising a grade in either direction. Confidence medium on volume, not on depth.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.