EZBlockchain

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:3.8/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:4.2/5(81%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2018)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.0★

3.0 from 6 Trustpilot reviews, and they divide sharply by stage of the relationship. Onboarding is praised: reviewers describe a professional intake call that took time over unusual requirements, a better rate than a previous host, same-day paperwork, named staff who stayed in contact, and miners hashing within a day of arriving at the Georgia site. The complaints come from customers further in, and they are not minor. One hosting customer of over a year reports uptime well below the guaranteed 90%, no downtime credits ever issued, a request to exit the contract on those grounds refused, and the company then ceasing to respond. Another describes being billed for a full month regardless of provisioning date, and power to their machines being cut under mandatory curtailment the moment South Carolina electricity became expensive — put on "sleep mode", in the company's own wording — on a quotation that had been inclusive of power. Two further one-stars cite non-transparent pricing and being kept in the dark. Six reviews is too few to settle anything, but the shape is consistent: the sales and setup experience is good, and the disputes arise over uptime, curtailment and billing once machines are running. Those are exactly the terms to pin down in writing before hosting here — the uptime guarantee and what it pays out, whether curtailment is included in the quoted rate, and the proration of the first month.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC

A flare-gas and mobile-data-centre specialist with a long-established domain and a Trustpilot score around 3 out of 5 on a small review count. The complaints are specific and operational: downtime well below the advertised uptime guarantee with no credits issued, periods of no response to customer contact, and a lack of transparency on hosting prices; there is also a ComplaintsBoard listing. Positive reviews describe professional onboarding, competitive rates and support responses inside 24 hours. Genuinely mixed, with real unresolved service complaints - C.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit Summary

No hosting-customer evidence found on Reddit after searching all three angles (exact, hosting, review). What exists is company-side and press-shaped rather than customer experience: partnership announcements with Texas oil producers on gas-flaring reduction, hiring posts, and a well-received product demo of the natural-gas-powered "Smartbox" containers (130 points, no complaints). One "is it legit or a scam" inquiry thread exists with no substantive answer either way. No hosting-customer complaints and no hosting-customer endorsements, so Reddit is left unscored for this company rather than graded from company PR. Two findings worth keeping that are NOT Reddit-sourced and are counted in their own columns: the Directory's BBB rating for this company is F (not BBB-accredited), and the company had a real strategic partnership with Wattum Management, whose custody-complaint pattern is documented under the Enegix entry.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.