Digital Bridge Mining

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsB+

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:3.0/5(Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:4.6/5(89%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2021)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.5★

3.5 from 10 Trustpilot reviews — a small base, and one where the average is a poor guide because the reviews split cleanly into two eras rather than into two opinions. The positive reviews run from late 2022 through to the end of 2025 and are strikingly consistent in what they credit: one named principal who handles customers personally. Reviewers describe him as responsive, patient and straightforward, guiding first-time miners through hardware selection, shipping and customs, and in one case going out of his way to supply the documentation needed to insure the equipment. Several say they compared multiple hosting providers before choosing and picked this one on communication quality. Pricing across a range of ASIC models is described as competitive. The negative reviews are the more important read, because they concern delivery rather than sales. The most serious, from September 2025, reports three brand-new miners sent for hosting with not one operational after six months, cycling on and off throughout, and no refund of deposits offered. An earlier review reports a miner repeatedly going offline after the first month, billing that was not itemised, and overcharging — with the reviewer moving to a more flexible provider. The pattern worth weighing is that the praise concentrates on the pre-sale and onboarding relationship, while the complaints concentrate on sustained hosting performance and billing transparency once machines are racked. Those are different parts of the business, and a strong record on the first does not evidence the second. If you are considering hosting here, ask specifically about uptime guarantees, what remedy applies when a machine is down for an extended period, and whether billing is itemised — those are exactly the points the dissatisfied customers raise.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryB

Downgraded from A- because the open-web record is more mixed than the previous grade implied. Digital Bridge Mining is a real colocation host aimed at small-to-medium mining companies, and the positive reviews are specific and consistent — outstanding responsiveness, efficient communication and good uptime, with reviewers saying they would recommend it for hosted mining, and an aggregate around 4.2/5 on one review aggregator. But independent reviews also report miners going offline after the first month, overcharging and unclear billing, and unfavourable comparisons to other hosting facilities — the same billing-and-downtime shape that recurs across this sector. Scam Detector's algorithmic trust score of 74 is noted but carries little weight on its own per this site's evidence standard. A good operator with a genuine complaint pattern around billing clarity and post-onboarding uptime; B rather than A- until that pattern is contradicted.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC (limited data)

Two genuine threads name Digital Bridge Mining, and in both cases the company is asked about but never actually reviewed. In r/BitcoinMining someone weighing DBM's $0.079/kWh all-in rate got no reply from any DBM customer — only a competing host's pitch, which the original poster then signed with. In r/ASICMinersTalk a first-time buyer said he found DBM while browsing; commenters recommended several other hosts and warned against three named companies, but nobody mentioned DBM again either way. So there is real name recognition and zero reported experience, good or bad; graded neutral at low confidence.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.