Cryptohall24 (Hamm, Germany) offers full-service ASIC hosting across multiple international sites (USA, Finland, Norway, UK, and others), with air, hydro, and immersion cooling options depending on location and rates from roughly 2.7-8.5 euro-cents/kWh. Customers retain hardware ownership under a German-law contract with 12-36 month terms, including maintenance, monitoring, and firmware updates.
Recent Activity
TrustpilotMost recent mention
"This company is a joke. The contracts are Hard to understand and normally only for B2B. The company doesnt care if you are a Business or a person. They wont let you out of their contract. Better Go to swisshash they…"
Subscribers monitoring Cryptohall24 receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-Cooled
ASIC Hydro-Cooled
ASIC Immersion-CooledLocations
- office — Hamm, Germany(exact)
Hamm HQ office, Germany
Source ↗ - office — Hong Kong, Hong Kong(exact)
Hong Kong logistics/warehouse hub
Source ↗ - facility — Helsinki, Finland(guessed)
Hydro Bitcoin mining hosting, Finland (main city Helsinki)
Source ↗ - facility — Addis Ababa, Ethiopia(guessed)
Ethiopia hosting site (main city Addis Ababa)
Source ↗ - facility — United Arab Emirates(reported)
United Arab Emirates hosting capacity (country only, newly advertised)
Source ↗
⚖️ Regulatory
Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
🛡️ Trust SignalsA-
Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Trustpilot Summary4.0★
4.0 from 46 Trustpilot reviews. The positive material concerns retail hardware sales — helpful and quick customer service, stock verified, international shipping handled. The negatives concern the mining-contract side: rigs repeatedly offline with communication that reviewers say does not resolve it, and contracts described as hard to understand and difficult to exit, with one reviewer noting the B2B terms were applied to them as an individual.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 View on Trustpilot ↗
Google Search SummaryB-
A German-registered ASIC reseller and hosting provider; search returns a company with a German legal address, hardware from the main manufacturers, and broadly positive customer feedback, with no complaint threads, regulator notices or news reporting of disputes found. Most of the review coverage is automated trust-score aggregators (Traders Union, Scam Detector, Scamadviser), which are weak evidence in both directions and disagree with each other here. No independent firsthand hosting-customer accounts turned up on Reddit or Bitcointalk. Held at B- for a clean record on thin independent evidence.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "Cryptohall24 reviews" ↗Reddit SummaryC (limited data)
Two genuine mentions, both passing, and neither reports an experience with this company. In r/BitcoinMining's "Miner Hostings in Europe" (2 years ago) a prospective customer writes that they have "looked at cryptohall24 so far" and asks directly whether anyone can confirm the company is legit. Nobody answered about Cryptohall24. In a later thread asking about NexMine, the poster lists Cryptohall24 and Bitkern as the German alternatives they compared against before choosing NexMine — again with no account of dealing with either. So the company is visibly present in the European hosting conversation and is on prospective buyers' shortlists, which is not nothing. What is absent is any first-hand report at all: no uptime, payout, support or billing account exists here in either direction. The mild negative worth naming is the shape of that absence — a public request to confirm legitimacy went unanswered in a subreddit where satisfied customers routinely do vouch for their host — but two unanswered questions are thin evidence and should not be read as a finding. Graded C at low confidence: genuinely too little to say anything, which the rubric represents through confidence rather than by withholding a grade. Six further results were discarded as collisions; note this company's name is a documented Reddit token-split trap, with "cryptohall24" fuzzy-matching to "crypto24" and pulling unrelated ransomware-group material.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "Cryptohall24" ↗