Core Scientific has shifted its public-facing business entirely to AI/HPC high-density colocation (the CoreWeave-era pivot); crypto-mining hosting is no longer marketed anywhere on its site.
Recent Activity
Hacker NewsMost recent mention
"I mean Michigan really loves it when something gives jobs, so as long as the data center actually enacts on it then I suspect opposition will go away<p>That said, we've seen data center projects often employ much…"
Subscribers monitoring Core Scientific receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗
BBB Profile
Locations
- office — Austin, United States(exact)
Austin HQ, Texas
Source ↗ - facility — Dalton, United States(exact)
Dalton 1 data center, Georgia
Source ↗ - facility — Calvert City, United States(exact)
Calvert City data center, Kentucky
Source ↗ - facility — Marble, United States(exact)
Marble data center, North Carolina
Source ↗ - facility — Grand Forks, United States(exact)
Grand Forks, North Dakota data center (100 MW)
- facility — Muskogee, United States(exact)
Muskogee, Oklahoma data center (100 MW, CoreWeave HPC site)
- facility — Greenville, United States(exact)
Hunt County, Texas data center (near Dallas, 285 MW leasable)
- facility — Pecos, United States(exact)
Pecos, Texas data center ("Cottonwood", 253-300 MW)
- facility — Austin, United States(exact)
Austin data center (15-20 MW), Texas
- facility — Denton, United States(exact)
Denton data center campus, Texas
Source ↗ - facility — Auburn, United States(exact)
Auburn, Alabama data center (50 MW)
⚖️ RegulatoryF-
Checked against 5 regulator sources — no warnings found.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- Federal Court Records:1.0/5(18 cases)· checked Aug 31, 2026view ↗
18 federal court records matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "Vicon Construction, LLC v. Core Scientific, Inc." (District Court, W.D. North Carolina, filed 2026-07-16); "Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Core Scientific, Inc." (District Court, E.D. Texas, filed 2025-05-12); "Core Scientific, Inc. v. CES Corporation" (District Court, W.D. Texas, filed 2024-04-22); "Core Scientific Specialty Mining (Oklahoma) LLC v. GEM Mining 1, LLC" (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, filed 2024-03-01); "Hoffman" (District Court, S.D. Texas, filed 2024-01-31) — plus 13 more. At least one appears to be a BANKRUPTCY proceeding. Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).
🛡️ Trust SignalsB+
Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Google Search SummaryD
Core Scientific has a serious documented history: a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing (December 2022) after its share price fell 98%, a securities fraud class-action lawsuit, and a Celsius Network motion alleging violations of bankruptcy-stay provisions and improper surcharges. A 2026 contractor lawsuit also alleges $2.5M in unpaid work. The company has since restructured around AI/HPC hosting (CoreWeave partnership), but this history is real and well-corroborated.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "Core Scientific reviews" ↗Reddit SummaryC (limited data)
review angle is almost entirely collision — 'Core Scientific' matches peer-review, scientific-method and NIST posts in unrelated subs. One CORZ price-crash rant, excluded as price commentary under Step 2b.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "Core Scientific" ↗