CleanSpark

⚖️ RegulatoryD

Checked against 1 regulator source — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Federal Court Records:2.0/5(10 cases)· checked Aug 30, 2026view ↗

  10 federal court records matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "CleanSpark, Inc. v. International Land Alliance Inc." (District Court, S.D. California, filed 2025-04-08); "Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. v. CleanSpark, Inc." (District Court, S.D. New York, filed 2024-07-16); "Smith v. Bradford" (District Court, D. Nevada, filed 2023-03-23); "Ciceri v. Bradford" (District Court, D. Nevada, filed 2021-05-26); "Hasthantra v. CleanSpark, Inc." (District Court, S.D. New York, filed 2021-01-20) — plus 5 more. Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Freshness:5.0/5(99%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2009)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Google Search SummaryC+

CleanSpark (NASDAQ: CLSK) faced a 2021 securities class-action lawsuit alleging misleading statements about acquisitions and contract figures. No recent operational or hosting-customer complaints were found — consistent with it not offering third-party hosting. Current automated trust checks read as clean, though that carries little weight either way.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit Summary

Three angles (exact, review, hosting) return only r/CleanSpark shareholder traffic, HPC/AI-lease news reposts and analyst chatter. No hosting-customer voice at all. Discarded: the r/Scams thread about cleanspark-augment.com (a phishing clone using the name, not the company), and a r/RapidCity data-centre siting thread (local objectors, not customers).

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Bitcointalk SummaryC+

CleanSpark's Bitcointalk presence (searched via the forum's own search, ~50 results spanning 2017-2026) is dominated by two things, neither of which is customer experience: automated news-repost bot activity (accounts like Alex077, chmod755, and Bits.media mechanically mirroring CleanSpark press releases — ASIC purchases, hashrate milestones, facility acquisitions — with essentially no organic reply engagement), and generic "list of public bitcoin miners" mentions where CleanSpark is just named alongside Bitfarms, MARA, Riot, TeraWulf, Hut 8, and IREN in broader market-commentary threads. The closest things to real sentiment are stock-speculation threads (a "mining stocks plummeted" post, a CEO Bitcoin-price prediction getting mocked as fortune-telling). No mentions of hosting customers, payouts, uptime, support, contracts, or scam accusations tied to CleanSpark specifically turned up anywhere. Note: CleanSpark is a large, vertically-integrated self-mining public company (Nasdaq: CLSK), which may explain the total absence of third-party hosting-customer discussion.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.