CircleHash

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 2 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2024)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary2.3★

2.3 from 16 Trustpilot reviews. Complaints cluster around fulfilment and exit: hardware paid for but not shipped, or shipped only after weeks of chasing; refunds not received after a contract was withdrawn from; and payouts said to have stopped while full energy costs continued to be charged. The largest single dispute on the profile is a refused refund of $27,092.90 on an order the customer says they cancelled before it shipped, declined on the basis of a hosting and performance agreement the customer says they never signed. Several reviewers also raise transparency concerns — a mobile number as the contact address, little company information, and a group of trading names behind one entity. A minority report the opposite experience: accurate hashrates, a usable dashboard, and hashing started within 48 hours on the orders that took the paid premium option, with one support issue resolved in under four days. One reviewer who waited a month and had to chase repeatedly does confirm the miner eventually arrived and works. Two things to know when reading this profile. Reviewers note the company also trades as "OneMiners", so the record for this operation is split across two listings that score very differently — the OneMiners profile sits at 4.5 — and a review of the same business may appear under either name. And at 16 reviews the base is small enough that a single dispute moves the average, so weigh the individual accounts rather than the number.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryF

CircleHash LLC and OneMiners are the same company — CircleHash is the registered legal entity and OneMiners is the customer-facing trade name. This is stated by the company itself ("CircleHash is evolving into OneMiners"), confirmed by the Google Play listing whose package identifier is com.circlehash.oneminers, and matches a Wyoming Secretary of State record for CircleHash LLC at 701 Tillery Street, Austin, Texas. The Directory carries the two brands as separate entries, so this grade should be read together with the OneMiners entry. The customer record is consistent across both names and is the reason for the grade: firsthand complaints describe payouts that stopped arriving while energy charges continued, miners that were not released back to their owners, orders taken and not delivered, refunds not issued, and support that does not answer. Independent scan sites rate the domain only moderately. Set against that, its Trustpilot profile shows a high average — the same contrast documented in detail under OneMiners, where forum investigators traced facility photographs to stock images and to two unrelated real companies, found a claimed payment-gateway partnership to be false, and recorded a promotional account network that moderators subsequently removed. Treat positive material about either brand with that context in mind. These are customer reports and investigator findings, not adjudicated determinations.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC- (limited data)

THIN — exactly one Reddit thread names CircleHash, across eight captures and all three angles between 2026-08-14 and 2026-08-27. Graded C- at LOW confidence, and the low confidence is doing real work here: this is one mention, and it is a question rather than a customer report. The mention is r/BitcoinMining "Is OneMiners legit?", where the original poster asks "Anyone knows whether OneMiners Hosting (or Circlehash?) is legit?" and adds that the operation has "mixed reviews on Reddit and in other platforms, mostly leaning towards scam/ponzi but some saying its legit as well." That framing matters: the only Reddit user to type this company's name did so while trying to establish whether it was safe to send $10-20K. Every substantive reply in the thread discusses OneMiners, never CircleHash by name. Those replies are genuinely mixed, which is why the grade sits in the C band. Two customers report working hardware — three KAS miners with "no complaints yet" and "uptime has been super solid", and a BTC hydro miner "so far so good" — and a third describes a well-communicated hosted ALEO order. Against that, the same thread reports a $25 auto-withdraw glitch the customer could not get reversed, scrypt rewards broken "for weeks", a Slovak-language complaint about the partner electricity price moving from $0.0525 to $0.0798/kWh overnight, and a reader pointing others at an "is OneMiners a scam" writeup. Read this grade with one thing in mind. Reviewers elsewhere state that CircleHash LLC trades as OneMiners, and the two names sit on very different records in this directory: OneMiners carries a Reddit grade of F on a large body of evidence including a $27,000 non-refund and an active IC3 report, and CircleHash's own Trustpilot profile sits at 2.3. A thin C- here reflects how little Reddit says under THIS name — it is not a clean bill of health, and anyone using it should read the OneMiners entry alongside it. Eight further results were discarded as collisions: consistent-hashing explainers in r/softwarearchitecture and r/Backend, a guitar-scales question, r/words, r/DieselTechs, and company-run r/oneminers app announcements that name OneMiners rather than CircleHash.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.