BitCluster hosts Bitcoin ASIC mining equipment (and sells hardware directly) with an advertised $0.045/kWh electricity rate, 98% uptime, and full equipment insurance, operating sites including Ethiopia and Paraguay. Its specific cooling method isn't stated on-site.
Recent Activity
GoogleMost recent mention
"Great team Bitcluster Moscow! By the way the entrance is in the building opposite the government excise department in the side street"
Subscribers monitoring BitCluster receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-CooledLocations
- facility — Addis Ababa, Ethiopia(exact)
Addis Ababa mining facility (120 MW, GERD hydro)
Source ↗ - facility — Ciudad del Este, Paraguay(approximate)
Ciudad del Este data centre, Paraguay
Source ↗ - facility — Saransk, Russia(approximate)
Saransk mining centre (container-based)
Source ↗ - facility — Norilsk, Russia(approximate)
Norilsk data centre (former nickel smelter site, Taymyr)
Source ↗ - facility — Ivanovo, Russia(approximate)
Ivanovo mining centre (container-based)
Source ↗ - facility — Krasnoyarsk, Russia(approximate)
Krasnoyarsk data centre
Source ↗ - facility — Irkutsk, Russia(approximate)
Irkutsk mining facility
Source ↗ - facility — Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia(approximate)
Khanty-Mansiysk mining facility
Source ↗ - facility — Asuncion, Paraguay(guessed)
Paraguay mining facility (main city: Asuncion)
Source ↗ - office — Dubai, United Arab Emirates(guessed)
UAE contact office (+971; main city: Dubai)
Source ↗
⚖️ Regulatory
Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-10 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
🛡️ Trust SignalsA-
Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Google Search SummaryC
Operating since 2017 with hosting sites documented on data-centre directories, including the Norilsk facility above the Arctic Circle on a former Nornickel smelter site, plus locations listed in Ethiopia and Paraguay. Search found no complaints, disputes, regulator actions or fraud allegations - but equally no firsthand hosting-customer accounts on Reddit, Bitcointalk or Trustpilot. The only reviews available are automated trust scores, which are not evidence in either direction. Too little customer-side information to judge, which is what the C range is for.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "BitCluster reviews" ↗Reddit Summary
ZERO. Seven captures across all three angles — exact, hosting and review — between 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-27, and no customer discussion of this hosting operator exists on Reddit. Two separate collisions swamp the query. The first is a DIFFERENT BitCluster: a 2015-16 blockchain-forensics research project that claimed to de-anonymise Bitcoin users, which produced a cluster of threads in r/Bitcoin, r/btc and r/Monero ("BitCluster Claims To De-Anonymize Bitcoin users", "Big Brother's Best Friend", "BitCluster presents tool for tracking bitcoin transactions"). Those are the top exact-match results and they are about a surveillance tool, not a mining host. The second is substring noise — Qwen quantisation benchmarks in r/LocalLLaMA, a "bits cluster" breadboard question in r/diyelectronics, r/ClusterHeadaches, r/weddingring, r/DataHoarder, r/darksouls, r/RobocraftExperiments and a u/rabbitcluster profile. Three results plausibly do concern this company — "ViaBTC and BitCluster signed a strategic partnership agreement" (r/BitcoinMining, 6y ago, 2 votes, 1 comment), "China's exiled crypto machines fuel global mining boom" (r/Bitcoin) and a Russian mining-expansion news repost — but all three are announcements or press reposts, not customer reports, and the rubric excludes non-customer material from the classification. One of them carries a single comment; none describes uptime, payouts, support or delivery. reddit_grade stays null. A six-year-old partnership press release is not evidence about how this operator treats customers, and inventing a grade from it would be worse than saying plainly that Reddit has nothing.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "BitCluster" ↗