Bit Digital

⚖️ RegulatoryF-

Checked against 5 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• Federal Court Records:1.0/5(3 cases)· checked Aug 31, 2026view ↗

  3 federal court records matched this company as a party in the RECAP archive: "Nitcheu v. Bit Digital, Inc." (District Court, S.D. New York, filed 2021-03-16); "Yang v. Bit Digital, Inc." (District Court, S.D. New York, filed 2021-01-26); "In re Bit Digital, Inc. Securities Litigation" (District Court, S.D. New York, filed 2021-01-20). At least one appears to be a BANKRUPTCY proceeding. Litigation presence is a caution flag requiring manual review, not proof of wrongdoing — the company may be a plaintiff, and party-name matches can collide with similarly named entities (case names listed above so a human can verify).

🛡️ Trust SignalsA

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:3.5/5(Caution Recommended)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2013)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:5.0/5(99%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary3.2★

Two Trustpilot reviews, both alleging fraud - and both describing a product that does not correspond to what a mining and digital-infrastructure operator sells, which is the more important fact about them. One (2022) says money was deposited and the reviewer was then emailed to pay again in order to receive their 'interest'. The other (2024) alleges the site is fraudulent and that various fees were demanded repeatedly before a withdrawal would be released. Escalating payments to unlock a withdrawal, on a balance that supposedly earns interest, is the signature of an advance-fee scheme rather than an account of a hosting or mining service - there is no deposit-and-earn-interest product here for a customer to have been defrauded of. This directory has documented repeatedly that the Trustpilot page of a legitimate company routinely carries reviews describing someone else's conduct, most often an impostor trading on the name. Neither review is treated here as evidence about this company's own conduct, and both have been flagged for adjudication rather than counted against it. What that leaves is an absence rather than a finding: no genuine customer review of this company exists on Trustpilot yet, and a 3.2 TrustScore resting on two reviews of contested provenance carries no usable signal.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC

Upgraded from D, with a significant relevance caveat. Bit Digital (NASDAQ: BTBT) is a US-listed, SEC-filing company and no customer complaint pattern surfaced in this pass, which does not support a D. The material development is strategic: through 2026 the company has pivoted away from Bitcoin mining toward Ethereum treasury management and AI/high-performance-computing infrastructure via its majority-owned subsidiary WhiteFiber (NASDAQ: WYFI), reporting Q1 2026 revenue of $27.9 million and holding roughly 158,000 ETH (about $327 million at the quarter-end price), with a large tranche repositioned into liquid-staked ETH for yield. Management now describes the business as a 'Strategic Asset Company' rather than a miner. DIRECTORY NOTE: this is an equity and treasury story, not a retail mining-hosting one — Bit Digital does not appear to be selling hosting or mining services to individual customers, so its presence on a hosting directory may warrant review. Graded on entity accountability, which is genuine; there is no consumer service record to grade.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryC+

Bit Digital (Nasdaq: BTBT) is another public miner pivoting toward AI/HPC infrastructure, and its Reddit footprint is small-scale investor chatter (r/pennystocks, r/StockInvest, r/10xPennyStocks) rather than hosting-customer reviews — threads like "BTBT Has Potential" and "time to buy" run 2-7 comments each, generally bullish on the AI pivot, with no service-quality complaints found. (Note: a same-titled "is BITS digital legit" thread about BITS Pilani, an Indian university, is unrelated and was excluded.)

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.