B2Miner is a Czech Republic-based ASIC hosting provider that buys, hosts, and services mining hardware on behalf of customers, who retain ownership of their machines throughout. It sells air-cooled models including the Antminer Z15 Pro and L9 alongside its hosting service.
Recent Activity
TrustpilotMost recent mention
"I had an excellent experience with 2Bminer. After purchasing my machine, they provided the full service package – hosting, operation, and ongoing management – with all additional costs included. Everything is…"
Subscribers monitoring B2Miner receive updates on negative publicity — unlock Monitor Company ↗
BBB Profile
Mining Type
ASIC Air-CooledLocations
- office — Los Angeles, USA(exact)
Los Angeles office, California
Source ↗ - facility — Austin, USA(exact)
US mining hosting facilities, Texas
Source ↗ - facility — USA(guessed)
Upstate New York hosting center (no specific city disclosed)
Source ↗ - facility — USA(guessed)
Washington State hosting center (hydroelectric, no specific city disclosed)
Source ↗ - office — Prague, Czech Republic(exact)
Prague HQ, Czech Republic — Pernerova 691/42, Karlin, 186 00 Praha 8. Checked 2026-07-11 via a real browser navigating directly into Google Maps (not web search): found a real, named Google Business Profile "2bminer" (category: Computer hardware manufacturer) at this exact address, linked to 2bminer.com, phone +420 705 903 833. Corrects a prior generic Prague city-center placeholder that coincidentally matched Braiins' and OneMiners' placeholders too (all 3 overlapped into what looked like 1 pin on the map).
Source ↗ - facility — Dubai, United Arab Emirates(guessed)
UAE mining hosting facility (main city Dubai)
Source ↗
⚖️ Regulatory
Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.
Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
- US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the CFTC RED List as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the UK FCA Warning List as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on the SEC PAUSE list as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
- IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
Not named on IOSCO’s Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.
🛡️ Trust SignalsA-
Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.
Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.
Trustpilot Summary3.7★
A single Trustpilot review, which is thin evidence rather than a verdict. It is a 5-star account from September 2025 by a customer who bought a machine and took the full package - hosting, operation and ongoing management, with the additional costs included in the price. They describe the arrangement as transparent, say they can watch the miner working without handling technical or logistical problems themselves, and note a custom web platform for managing their portfolio. At one review the displayed TrustScore of 3.7 reflects Trustpilot's own baseline far more than it reflects customer experience. Nothing here contradicts the positive account, but nothing corroborates it either - treat this profile as 'not yet reviewed' rather than as a rating, and look to the other sources on this page for a fuller picture.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 View on Trustpilot ↗
Google Search SummaryF
Multiple review sites describe 2bminer.com as a fraudulent cloud-mining platform — false profit promises, fabricated testimonials, high-pressure tactics urging larger and faster deposits, and users reporting frozen accounts, lost deposits and no working support or verifiable contact details. Two evidence caveats belong on this record. First, the sources making these claims are largely low-quality review-farm sites rather than regulators, courts or dated firsthand customer accounts, so they are weak evidence on their own. Second, the name collides badly: b2miner.com, b2miners.com and the unrelated legitimate pool 2miners.com all appear in the same results, and some of the scam write-ups address those other domains. The grade stays at F on the strength of the earlier record rather than this pass, which adds volume but not verification.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Google for "B2Miner reviews" ↗Reddit Summary
Reddit returns nothing for this company — not irrelevant results, but no results at all. Every one of ten captures across the exact, review and hosting angles, spanning 11 to 22 August 2026, came back with Reddit's own "we couldn't find any results for B2Miner" page. There is no footprint here to read either way, so the grade is left unassigned rather than inferred from absence.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Reddit for "B2Miner" ↗Bitcointalk Summary
No genuine Bitcointalk coverage found. Direct forum search for "B2Miner" surfaced only two 2014-2015 FreshCoin altcoin announcement threads, where "b2miner" is a forum username of an unrelated poster who commented in those threads — not the company. Low relevance scores (~20%) on both hits confirm this is a username collision, not company coverage.
Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.
🔍 Search Bitcointalk for "B2Miner" ↗