Antpool

⚖️ Regulatory

Not yet checked against any regulatory sources.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA+

Checked against 3 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• Website Freshness:4.7/5(93%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:5.0/5(since 2013)· checked Aug 25, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary2.2★

2.2 from 12 Trustpilot reviews. The credible complaints are pool-specific and consistent: payouts reviewers say were reduced or withheld, commissions around 10% below what published calculators indicated, difficulty reaching support, and materially worse performance than a competing pool over several days. Readers should note that some reviews on this profile describe cloud-mining contracts and a lookalike domain — Antpool is a mining pool and does not sell cloud-mining contracts, so that material appears to concern an impersonator rather than Antpool itself and has been excluded from this assessment.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryC

One of the largest and longest-running Bitcoin pools, and critics broadly concede its technical reliability and payout fairness — but the customer-facing record is poor and the picture splits sharply by region. Its Trustpilot profile is small and rated around 2.2, with the recurring complaints being withdrawal requests refused despite the stated terms, balances dropping without explanation, and support not responding; within Chinese-language circles the reputation is considerably stronger, helped by the Bitmain relationship, while English-language communities also raise centralisation concerns. The complaint volume is too thin to establish a pattern but too specific to dismiss, and it all concerns access to funds rather than hashrate. Mixed — held at C.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryB

Antpool (Bitmain's in-house mining pool, not a hosting/colocation provider) has years of Reddit history, mostly Bitcoin protocol politics rather than customer complaints: the 2017 block-size-war threads, and still-active concern that Antpool plus Foundry USA together exceed 45-50% of global hashrate - a network-centralisation worry, not a company-trust one. Re-read August 2026 across all three search angles. Two new items: a r/cryptomining user switched to Antpool for ZEC, saw unstable hashrate reporting and a payout held pending KYC approval, and left for another pool - a real but single, small-scale service complaint. And a r/bitcoinismoney post claiming Antpool is attacking Bitcoin by mining invalid blocks, which the thread's own commenters dismiss as a known crank; not evidence. On the positive side Antpool voluntarily refunded a customer's accidental 1,000 BTC transaction fee and joined the Stratum V2 working group. One ZEC payout complaint does not move a grade built on years of no fraud, scam or non-payment pattern. B, confidence medium.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.