Abundant Mines

⚖️ Regulatory

Checked against 4 regulator sources — no warnings found.

Reads whatever court/regulator sources are configured for this score (see the Regulatory section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• IOSCO Investor Alerts:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on IOSCO's Investor Alerts Portal as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention for regulator lists: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• UK FCA Warning List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the UK FCA Warning List of unauthorised firms as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US SEC PAUSE List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the SEC's Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE) list as of 2026-07-09 (checked by name and domain). Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

• US CFTC RED List:5.0/5(Not listed)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗

  Not named on the CFTC RED (Registration Deficient) List as of 2026-07-09 -- checked by name/domain and directly confirmed absent from the alphabetically-adjacent "Ab-Ac" range of the live list. Scored 5.0/5 under this project's pass/fail convention: clean = 5.0, listed = 1.0.

🛡️ Trust SignalsA-

Checked against 4 trust signals — see the per-source breakdown below.

Reads whatever site-health/trust sources are configured for this score (see the Trust Signals section below) and reports back — it's a starting point for your own research, not a verdict.

• ScamAdviser:4.0/5(Very Likely Safe)· checked Jul 9, 2026view ↗
• Website Exists:5.0/5(A)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Website Freshness:4.9/5(97%)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗
• Site History:4.0/5(since 2023)· checked Sep 3, 2026view ↗

Trustpilot Summary4.0★

Three genuine Trustpilot reviews are on file, so there is still very little review-based evidence here. All three are five stars and all are unusually detailed. The earliest (November 2025) comes from a customer who says they have toured one of the mining farms in person, met much of the team, names two staff members, describes the company as transparent, and says they plan to expand their fleet here. A second (August 2026) is written by one person on behalf of three related businesses — JR28, Explore Companies and Main Street LLC — describing a first fleet bought through the company in June 2025 and a second in September, and saying that across both companies the operator has done what it said it would on site performance and rates. The third, also August 2026, describes onboarding in which a named staff member walked the reviewer through comparing miners before purchase and through the technical infrastructure for monitoring the investment afterwards. All three read like real customers rather than templates. Note what they are not, though: one is a single voice speaking for three entities, so three reviews here are not three fully independent accounts, and all come from customers buying at fleet scale or with hands-on onboarding, whose experience will not necessarily match a single-machine buyer's. The displayed TrustScore should not be read as a rating either — on a profile with this few reviews Trustpilot's score sits close to its own baseline and carries almost no information about the company. Treat this source as barely reviewed and weigh the other sources on this page more heavily until more accumulate.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Google Search SummaryB-

Abundant Mines (Oregon, clean BPA hydro power) has mostly positive automated trust assessments and no confirmed scam indicators, though reviews found were largely on the company's own site (self-published, weaker evidence) with limited independent third-party corroboration, and some noted gaps in upfront pricing/equipment transparency. Consistent with this site's own earlier, more favorable direct research on the company.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Reddit SummaryB-

Abundant Mines is one of the few hosts on this roster with sustained, on-topic Reddit discussion: five dedicated r/BitcoinMining and r/MiningRig threads over about two years, plus a recent r/bitcoinismoney post. The customer voices are few but unusually detailed, and they agree with each other on what matters for a host. One customer running S21+, S21 Pro and S21 XP units reports paying $225/month, calls it 'white glove service', says he never has to keep tabs on his miners, estimates roughly 99% uptime and states they beat every hosting company he has used on that measure; he adds that during a repair they run a substitute unit at no cost so his hashrate does not drop. A second customer arrived after losing about $50k at Compass Mining in 2023 and then finding Simple Mining's downtime credits inadequate; he describes Abundant as transparent and responsive, names a staff member he rates highly, reports good uptime, and singles out the same Hashrate Redirect feature as the real differentiator. A third commenter recommends them unprompted as 'awesome', citing white-glove service and strong uptime from the moderate Pacific Northwest climate. Notably, a competing hosting operator in the same thread volunteered that he had never heard anything negative about them. The negatives are real but commercial and minor rather than service failures. Two people note the company does not publish prices, and one calls declining to give a quote 'kind of a red flag' - though he conceded he was inferring, and the original poster had not actually requested one. Abundant is consistently the most expensive option quoted: around $6,500 for an S21 Pro against $5,495 at Simple Mining and $4,775 at Compass, and $225/month power against $202 and $212; customers who like them frame that premium as the price of the service level. You also cannot ship in your own hardware - machines must be bought through them. A prospective buyer who consulted four hosts found Abundant's sales conversation unremarkable next to Sazmining's, and one earlier poster who interviewed them chose CryptoCaddy instead on feel rather than on any complaint. Graded B- on hosting evidence: mostly positive, with the only recurring gripes being price opacity and a premium that customers accept knowingly. Confidence medium - the discussion volume is good but only about three of the voices are first-hand hosting customers, the rest being prospects and industry commenters. No complaint about uptime, payouts, billing disputes, hardware handling or support was found in any thread. This capture itself added nothing new: the daemon re-read all five genuine threads and found every comment count unchanged, opening only an r/SimCompanies game thread about an 'abundance mine' that has nothing to do with the company.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.

Bitcointalk SummaryC

Minimal, low-confidence Bitcointalk footprint (site search "abundant mines" + full-thread read of the one hit, 2026-07-18): zero scam/fraud/complaint threads anywhere. The only mention is a claim in the June/July 2026 BIP-110 (RDTS) AMA thread that "Abundant Mines announced they would start signalling for BIP-110" — but this was asserted by Greg Tonoski, the thread's sole BIP-110 proponent, immediately after being called a liar by another poster for overstating an unrelated claim in the same exchange, with no source given and zero corroboration from anyone else across 130+ replies. Treated as unverified, not as confirmation of anything about the company. Grade C: no negative signal found, but real evidentiary content about the company on this forum is effectively nil.

Compiled from public forum/search discussion (via manual research, automated tools, or both), not independently verified. Reflects poster opinions, not confirmed fact.